The Fabulous Fibonacci Numbers Review

Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)Are you looking to buy The Fabulous Fibonacci Numbers? Here is the right place to find the great deals. we can offer discounts of up to 90% on The Fabulous Fibonacci Numbers. Check out the link below:

>> Click Here to See Compare Prices and Get the Best Offers

The Fabulous Fibonacci Numbers ReviewThis is a beautifully produced book. The front jacket is amongst the most attractive I have seen and the back cover is dense with quotations from reviews singing its praises, including one from a Nobel Laureate. Oh dear, how we can be deceived by outside appearances! The text contains so many errors, misleading statements and moments of such stupidity that to discuss them all would require a volume about equal in size to the original.
Let me take you through a few examples: -
Page 21. 41/12 is neither a square number nor an integer as claimed in the text.
Page 22. There is no contradiction in Fibonacci stating that the problem under discussion is indeterminate and for him then to give a (correct) solution to it.
Page 33. The proof of Property 2 given in appendix B is a proof by contradiction, not a proof by induction as stated.
Page 34. Many of the factors listed in Figure 1-9 are wrong. See, for example, the factors given for the sixth Fibonacci number.
Page 40. Figure 1-11 is confusing. What is the rectangle on the RHS supposed to indicate?
Page 48, Figures 1-14 and 1-15. Contrary to their captions, both would seem to contain an odd number of rectangles.
Page 49. Line 7 and line 18 are identical, lines 8 and 19, to which each is supposed to be equal, are not equal.
Page 49. Line 20. 1156 does not equal 342, and 342 is not the 29th Fibonacci number.
Page 51, last line but one. 520 is not the product of 18 and 29.
Page 56. The written summary of property 13 is wrong.
Page 80. Footnote should read `fourth difference', not `third difference'.
Page 82. Why express amazement that, in a table of differences for the Fibonacci sequence, each new line of differences repeats the original sequence. Give the way in which the sequence is generated, how could it possibly be otherwise.
Pages 91, 93 and 102. The term `left justified' has a different meaning on each page.
Pages 111 and 112. Having defined Phi such that 1/Phi = Phi - 1, the authors express amazement that their fractional parts are equal. They then expand each to 1000 DECIMAL PLACES to demonstrate this.
Chapter 3. The suggestion that the Fibonacci sequence is in some way connected to the powers of 2 and to the sequence of numbers generated by the partitioning of a circle, simply on the basis that all three sequences can be located in Pascal's Triangle, is nonsense.
Page 120. The claim that by replacing the `1' in the exact value of Phi with e^(i x Pi) establishes a deep and meaningful connection between Phi, Pi, e and i either the height of stupidity or a confidence trick.
These are not the worst examples, just a random selection from the first 120 pages. They keep on coming thick and fast throughout the rest of the book.
Any `general reader' who tries to follow the mathematical developments set out here will only have confirmed a belief that mathematics does not make sense. The authors and their publishers have done mathematics a grave disservice in having produced such a carelessly written and shoddily edited volume. This is terribly sad; if more care had been taken over researching, writing and editing, it could have been the best popular mathematics book in years.


The Fabulous Fibonacci Numbers Overview

Want to learn more information about The Fabulous Fibonacci Numbers?

>> Click Here to See All Customer Reviews & Ratings Now